Minnesota Board of Cosmetology is Manipulating IJ.org cases by Creating Anti-Trust Issues With the Public 
Minnesota Hair Braiding Registration Licensee are more POWERFUL than ever before in the current political circus of “GETTING A TABLE” vs a set at the table.
Here is a detailed timeline that I could come up with for a step-by-step of the action taken with the Minnesota Board of Cosmetology and the Institute for Justice.
I don’t know if this is information overload, but feel free to contact me for more of an explanation.
I have provides the links to the pages where you can look at the dates and find the pdf’s, memo or actions for each group.
The groups are:
Judge Lipman
Judge Pust
Hair Braiding
Licensed to Practice
Eyelashes
Institute for Justice and
Denise Jarrett
Denise Jarrett
-
4/2005-2006 Hair Braider Registration Statue creating ‘simple hair devices which include the needle’.
-
1/2008 Sample Hair Braider Curriculum
-
5/2/2011 Medical AP Estithican Regulated-Non Regulated “Licensed Practice in a doctors office”
-
5/2/2011 Medical Estheticians Disclaimer
-
3/20/2012 Denise Jarrett eco Hair Braider
-
2/25/2013 Proposed Online Course
-
10/7/2013 Medical Esthetician Task Force and Programs created at Saint Paul College
-
2/3/2015 Medical Esthetician CISDECO substitution for 40 hours continuing education and School Manager License
-
5/11/2015 1400.2500 Petition statue to Adopt 155A.28 Hair Braider statue
-
7/20/2015 Denial for 1400.2500 Petition
-
3/7/2017 Board of Cosmetology Eyelash Complaints of 274
-
7/15/2017 Eyelash SF2802 Passed without rules
-
7/16/2017 Eyelash and AP Esthetician Schools Surety Bonds
-
10/16/2017 Institute for Justice Repeal of both Eyelash and Hair Braiding Proposals
-
11/16/2017 Adoption of Eyelash Rules
-
12/4/2017 Launched Eyelash Instructors
-
3/8/2018 Administrative Judge Lipman Court
-
2/22/2018 Administrative Judge Pust Court 1st time
-
6/7/2018 Failed bills for Hair Braiding and Eyelash
-
8/9/2018 AP Esthetician Curriculum Changes to add Eyelash
-
8/20/2018 Administrative Judge Pust and Board draft court orders for permanent adoption of APE and Eyelash
-
8/23/2018 added Revisors rules with Simple Hair devices definition included in rules even though cosmetology does not govern hair braiding
-
9/24/2018 Adoption of APE and Eyelash enactment goes into effect.
In short, The Board of Cosmetology has deceptive practices on both the Institute for Justice and the public.
The permanent removal from governing hair braiders court order stated that the board was to advocate in good standing for health, safety, and sanitation for hair braider with the governor and legislation.
This was broken in the past legislative session in which the Board of Cosmetology maintained a neutral advocacy for the repeal.
https://mn.gov/boards/assets/2018-06%202018%20Legislative%20Update_tcm21-341804.pdf
Then the Board of Cosmetology after that didn’t work stole all of Institute for Justice works and adopted the eyelash and now the simple hair devices into their rules.
I think this matter needs a rehearing with the Administrative courts.
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/1400.8612/
Lipman
Pust I
Pust II
https://mn.gov/oah/assets/9013-33230-board-cosmetologest-examiners-rules-report_tcm19-327496.pdf
Hair Braiding Simple Devices
Institute for Justice
Medical Esthticans/ Licensed Practices
Eyelashes
Denise Jarrett
[…] As of 2018, these are the states where no licensing is required to open a Natural Hair Braiding Salon according to the Institute for Justice. […]
LikeLike