Minnesota Hair Braider Registration gets $0 and the Minnesota Board of Cosmetology Advanced Practice Esthetican get $2 millions for “needle” usage (UNEXCEPTABLE)

Minnesota Hair Braiding Registration License is the key to a Natural Hair Braider Board.

I want to explain more on how the Minnesota Hair Braider Registration Licensees “simple hair devices” are being manipulated into being in the Board of Cosmetology favor through legal cases brought on by the Institute for Justice.

Why should we care? Because it Black Women #AmeicanDOS who bare the bottom of the barrel to healthcare and HIV and HPV infections. However most don’t know how they contracted the virus.

I’m here in your face telling you while white women protect them selves you are the cost.Minnesota Hair Braiding Registration License

Minnesota Advance Practice Deceptions
A. In consequence, Judge Isabell Gomez’s Court Order, Section  III. Agreed Order, paragraph 8., letter B., and page 15.

Gives the Board the authority to make rules  and change the definition at will for “Simple Braiding Devices” it reads:

“Hair Braiding, Simple Braiding Devices, Hair Braiding Services, and Hair Braiding are defined are to be defined in Minn. R 2642.100 (which was later repealed and renumbered to Minn.R 2105) and Hair Braiding, Hair Braiding Services and Hair Braiders are to be construed as exempt from Minn. R 2100(2003), 2646(2003) and 2644(2003).


This gives the Board the authority to overwriting the definitions and rules for Hair Braiding, Simple Braiding Devices, and Hair Braiding Services.

But grants exemptions ONLY to Hair Braiding, Hair Braiding Services, and Hair Braiders.

Therefore, allowing the Boards total control over Simple Braiding Devices which includes the ‘needle’.

Unfortunately, this is how the Board can get back into the Health Practices Cataorgy and ask the goverment for more funding in approations through legislation for the health and welfare of the public.
B. The Revisors Rules docket RD4342 denied by Judge Eric Lipman but later approved by Judge Tammy Pust allows AP Estheticians to use Simple Hair Braiding Devices definition separate to create the medical health, safety and sanitation for the welfare of the public claims needed to support the NEW licensing of estheticians.
The Board ask for rulmaking authority over 155A.21 to 155A.36 this mistake includes 155A.28 for Hair Braiders Registration.
I beleive it’s valid enough for this procedural mistake to go back before an adminstrative judge.
In the Matter of the Board of Cosmetologist Examiners’ Proposed Permanent Rules Governing Advanced Practice Estheticians; Minnesota Rules Chapters 2105 and 2110 Section II. Rulemaking Authority.
8.  The Board also relies upon its general rulemaking authority under Minn. Stat. § 155A.26, which provides: The Board may develop and adopt rules according to chapter 14 that the Board considers necessary to carry out sections 155A.21 to 155A.36. 
9. With respect to regulating salons, the Board also relies on Minn. Stat. § 155A.29, subd. 2. This statute provides that “the conditions and process by which a salon is licensed shall be established by the Board by rule.” Additionally, Minn. Stat. § 155A.29, subd. 3, provides that “minimum infection control standards for the operation of a salon shall be established by rule.”  https://mn.gov/oah/assets/9013-33230-board-cosmetologest-examiners-rules-report_tcm19-327496.pdf
C. In addition to, creating the definition and rules for Sharps the Board has the athourity over simple braiding device the needle.

3.10 Subp. 11h. Sharps. “Sharps” means any object, sterile or contaminated, that may 

3.11 purposefully or accidentally cut or penetrate the skin or mucosa including presterilized 
3.12 single-use lancets, dermal blades, and razor blades. 
3.13 Subp. 11i. Sharps container. “Sharps container” means a closed, puncture-resistant,
 3.14 leak-proof container, labeled with the international biohazard symbol, that is used for 
3.15 handling, storage, transportation, and disposal of sharps. 
D. Judge Isabel Gomez’s ruling is being construded as Simple Braiding Devices are separate from Unregulated Services 10a to 10c and are numbered as 11g, 11i and now11j.
As a result, the Board can regulate the simple braiding devices that Hair Braiders use in their services.

3.16 Subp. 11i 11j. Simple braiding devices. “Simple braiding devices” include clips, 

3.17 combs, curlers, curling irons, hairpins, rollers, scissors, needles, and thread. 
 4.1 Subp. 13. Unregulated service. “Unregulated service” means those servicesnot 
4.2 defined as the practice of cosmetology under Minnesota Statutes, section 155A.23, 
4.3 subdivision 3, and that are exempt from regulation by the board. Unregulated services are 
4.4 ear piercing; body art; body painting; henna tattoos and permanent tattoos; eyebrow 
4.5 embroidery; eyebrow microblading; permanent hair removal; permanent makeup; tanning
 4.6 by UV radiation and spray tanning units; injectables; services for theatrical, television, film,
 4.7 fashion, photography, or media productions or media appearances; mortuary services; 
4.8 massage; body wraps and lymphatic drainage when performed by a massage therapist; the 
4.9 practice of medicine as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 147.081, subdivision 3; and 
4.10 hair braiding, hair braiding services, and hair braiders, as defined in subparts 10a to 10c; 
4.11 and threading as defined in Minnesota Statutes,section 155A.23,subdivision 13. Ordinances 
4.12 by local units of government that prohibit hair braiding, hair braiding services, or hair 4.13 braiders, as defined in subparts 10a to 10c, or regulate any matter relating to licensing, 
4.14 testing, or training of hair braiding, hair braiding services, or hair braiders are preempted 4.15 by this part.

Institute for Justice and The Minnesota Board of Cosmetology Deceptive Practices Against Hair Braiders

Minnesota Board of Cosmetology is Manipulating IJ.org cases by Creating Anti-Trust Issues With the Public

Minnesota Hair Braiding Registration Licensee are more POWERFUL than ever before in the current political circus of “GETTING A TABLE” vs a set at the table.

Here is a detailed timeline that I could come up with for a step-by-step of the action taken with the Minnesota Board of Cosmetology and the Institute for Justice.

I don’t know if this is information overload, but feel free to contact me for more of an explanation.

I have provides the links to the pages where you can look at the dates and find the pdf’s, memo or actions for each group.

The groups are:

Judge Lipman

Judge Pust

Hair Braiding

Licensed to Practice


Institute for Justice and

Denise Jarrett

Denise Jarrett

  1. 4/2005-2006 Hair Braider Registration Statue creating ‘simple hair devices which include the needle’.

  2. 1/2008 Sample Hair Braider Curriculum

  3. 5/2/2011 Medical AP Estithican Regulated-Non Regulated “Licensed Practice in a doctors office”

  4. 5/2/2011 Medical Estheticians Disclaimer

  5. 3/20/2012 Denise Jarrett eco Hair Braider

  6. 2/25/2013 Proposed Online Course

  7. 10/7/2013 Medical Esthetician Task Force and Programs created at Saint Paul College

  8. 2/3/2015 Medical Esthetician CISDECO substitution for 40 hours continuing education and School Manager License

  9. 5/11/2015 1400.2500 Petition statue to Adopt 155A.28 Hair Braider statue

  10. 7/20/2015 Denial for 1400.2500 Petition 

  11. 3/7/2017 Board of Cosmetology Eyelash Complaints of 274

  12. 7/15/2017 Eyelash SF2802 Passed without rules

  13. 7/16/2017 Eyelash and AP Esthetician Schools Surety Bonds

  14. 10/16/2017 Institute for Justice Repeal of both Eyelash and Hair Braiding Proposals

  15. 11/16/2017 Adoption of Eyelash Rules

  16. 12/4/2017 Launched Eyelash Instructors

  17. 3/8/2018 Administrative Judge Lipman Court

  18. 2/22/2018 Administrative Judge Pust Court 1st time

  19. 6/7/2018 Failed bills for Hair Braiding and Eyelash

  20. 8/9/2018 AP Esthetician Curriculum Changes to add Eyelash

  21. 8/20/2018 Administrative Judge Pust and Board draft court orders for permanent adoption of APE and Eyelash

  22. 8/23/2018 added Revisors rules with Simple Hair devices definition included in rules even though cosmetology does not govern hair braiding

  23. 9/24/2018 Adoption of APE and Eyelash enactment goes into effect.

In short, The Board of Cosmetology has deceptive practices on both the Institute for Justice and the public.

The permanent removal from governing hair braiders court order stated that the board was to advocate in good standing for health, safety, and sanitation for hair braider with the governor and legislation.

This was broken in the past legislative session in which the Board of Cosmetology maintained a neutral advocacy for the repeal.


Then the Board of Cosmetology after that didn’t work stole all of Institute for Justice works and adopted the eyelash and now the simple hair devices into their rules.

I think this matter needs a rehearing with the Administrative courts.




Pust I


Pust II


Hair Braiding Simple Devices


Institute for Justice


Medical Esthticans/ Licensed Practices




Denise Jarrett


Natural Hair Braider Registration Vision Board Masterclass


Natural Hair Braiding Vision Board MasterClass
I’m here to HELP!!

I’m hosting an online Vision Board Masterclass for Natural Hair Braiding Students, Stylist and, Salon/Shop owners.

In this MasterClass, we will work your Natural Hair Braiding personal business, social media marketing, and advertising plans.

Natural Hair Braiding, Minnesota and Dred Scott’sq

30-day Natural Hair History Challenge
Intro: Everyday for the next 30 days I will bring you natural hair historical tips one part facts and the other part my opinion.

Starting today with Black wealth and Dred Scott every Sunday a different subject with the same topic.
First, do you know who Dred Scott is?

Okay, I will wait. Better yet I will count to 30. That will give you about 15 seconds because nobody wants to wait that long.
A. Dred was an African American Black man enslaved in American in 1857 the won his, his wife, and their two daughters freedom from his oppressing slave master by the name of Sanford.
This was the beginning of the his-story of our hair problems and Wealth in my opinion.
Because Dred successfully won his freedom and now his slavery value as a black man with a family in 1857 was nearly $10,000 more than some whites this was a problem.
Take the time to think about that time in history when a slave was WORTH gold.
Now fast forward to today when there is a war on your hair and the wealth you acquire when you adorn your head with prestige locks of glory.

The definition of dread in the Cambridge online dictionary.

Dred Scott -vs-dread
noun [ U ] US /dred/
extreme fear or anxiety about something that is going to happen or might happen:
a dread of drowning
verb [ T ] US /dred/
We dreaded hearing the results of the blood tests.

Which brings me to the question of why was dreadlocks changed to lacking is a religion is a Rastafarian three locking religion it is the same as a Jewish mulsit the adorns a Jewish man head. Also, Dread Scott is the first slavery legend in economic freedom as well as a connotative statement such as Dred Monday at something one should hate to do. The decision to hire and fire with discriminatory practices against religion violates the American disabilities act and I believe that the natural hair braiding act shoot reflects that locking is a religion in, therefore; private institutions, public institutions, and even the supreme court should repeal their decision of dreading.

States With No Hair Braider License

Hi #SuperNaturals,
As of 2018, these are the states where no licensing is required to open a Hair Braiding Salon according to the Institute for Justice.

Here is the latest report from Institute for Justice called Barriers to Braiding on page 8:


Thanks again, Denise

Natural Hair Braider Registration Vision Board Masterclass


Natural Hair Braiding Vision Board MasterClass
I’m here to HELP!!

I’m hosting an online Vision Board Masterclass for Natural Hair Braiding Students, Stylist and, Salon/Shop owners.

In this MasterClass, we will work your Natural Hair Braiding personal business, social media marketing, and advertising plans.

1 White woman to 45.6 Black Women in Minnesota has HIV and 12 do Not know How it Was Contracted

Hi #SuperNatural’s
I’m writing the governor on behalf of the ecoHair Braider Association, LLC. and Minnesota Hair Braiding Registration Licensees as a registered Minnesota non-profit that brings awareness to the “needle” usage in the natural hair braiding salon by certifying and educating black women to become registered as a Minnesota 155A.28 Hair Braider.
The Minnesota Hair Braiding Registration Licensees would like the public to participate in supporting registered hair braiders to reduce the possible number of black women who are listed as not knowing how they contracted HIV (unknown) by the Minnesota Health Department and the AidsVureports.
The Minnesota Hair Braiding Registration Licensees are asking that due to the requirements of ‘Sharps’ being properly disposed and preventing of cross-picking in the OSHA Needle Stick Prevention Act we are as the governor to grant a proclamation month December to Natural Hair Braider Sew-In Weave Awareness.

Thanks in advance!